Pakistanis suck up to Middle Easterners

Given the situation of labor class Pakistanis in Gulf Arab countries where they are often underpaid, not even paid for months, abused, subject to false accusations and racism this important question arises once again: Why are Pakistanis so vigorously pro-Arab and pro-Middle Eastern?

The answer lies in a discomforting fact: Religion. Few are willing to face this fact. Because the last Prophet in Islam happened to be an Arab, many Pan-Islamist Pakistanis, particularly Wahhabbists simply worship Arabs.
This goes against Islamic teachings which openly stress Arabs and non-Arabs are equal in the eyes of the creator.

A fact to note is that Arabs identify themselves as Arabs, Turks as Turks, Persians as Persians. Even the ethnic minorities of Turkey, the Arab states and various ethnic groups of Iran identify with their countries before their religion. And even when they don't, they still identitfy with their individual ethnic group before their religion.

It's only the Pan-Islamist Pakistanis who see themselves as Muslims and identify themselves only as such.

These ignorant Pakistanis don't see the outright racism of Arabs against their people, nor do they realize Arabs would never want to include themselves with Pakistanis in their political movements.

You can often spot Pakistanis in pro-Palestinian demonstrations weather in Arab or Western countries. At times you can see many of them, they're not difficult to spot at a pro-Arab demo.
But never have I seen or heard of Arabs or any other Middle Eastern national at pro-Kashmiri/Pakistani demonstrations.

While Pakistani pilots volunteered and risked their lives in Arab-Israeli wars, no Arab pilot was given permission by his government to engage in direct combat against Indian pilots in the Indo-Pakistani wars.

It just doesn't end there with the Arabs. During the Iran-Iraq war right after the Shia Islamist regime in Iran took over, a lot of Arab and Western countries supported Iraq (Syria sided with Iran I believe), while North Korea and Pakistan were the only known countries to lend military support to Iran.

For instance North Korean missiles were shipped to Karachi and then transported from there into Iran on land through Balochistan under the escort of the Pakistan Army because the Gulf was too dangerous with ships being bombed and sunk from both sides. Once stationed in Iran, these missiles were used to hit Iraqi targets.

Yet today many ignorant and arrogant Iranians ignore this fact and falsely boast that Iran "fought alone" in the war without outside support.
Pakistani scientist Dr Abdul Quadeer Khan even put his life at risk by foolishly sharing nuclear technology with Iran, another fact deliberately ignored by most Iranians.

Instead, the current Iranian regime maintains good relations with India, sponsors protests against the treatment of Shias in Pakistan, when they have never protested against the oppression of their fellow Kashmiri Muslims by India or when Iran is known for it's discriminatory treatment of it's Sunni population. Iran has even lend India airbases within it's borders.

Imagine the reaction by the Arab and the Iranian regimes if Pakistan opened full diplomatic relations with Israel and allowed it to use Pakistani airbases. It's hypocrisy.
Yet all over the Internet and public debates, Pakistanis can be found everywhere, staunchly defending Iran in enriching it's nuclear program.

Another common phenomenon amongst Pakistanis is to claim Arab, Persian and/or Turkish ancestry. Some go as far as to claim direct descent from the Prophet Muhammad himself.
As I explained in another post, there was minor mixing with Arabs, Turko-Mongols (not the ones from Anatolia) and Persians. However, the majority still remain the same.

As the haplogroup maps below show, the distribution of the Semitic Haplogroup J1 (represented by the mutation M267) is very insignificant in Pakistan:




Even the Mughals, who were mostly Mongoloid, belonged to Haplogroup Q and it's subclades, invalidating Pakistani claims of Mughal ancestry.
Sadly enough there are even movements in Pakistan to make Arabic and/or Farsi the national language because some Pakistanis have decided to make Lashkari the scapegoat for all the linguistic tensions in the country and to "bring Pakistanis closer to their Muslim 'brothers,'" which I decried and refuted such bias against Lashakri.

Having good relations with countries in our region is important for political and economic benefits. But this unconditional love and sacrifice for Middle Eastern people will take us Pakistanis nowhere. It will gain us nothing and will only bring us losses.
As an example Pakistan supported the Arabs during the Arab-Israeli wars and sold Iran missiles to aim at Israel.

Israel has been (probably in retaliation) selling India sophisticated weapons technology and actively been training Indian troops in Kashmir. Had Pakistan stayed out of other peoples' conflicts Israel might not have sided with India.
Even in early 2006 Pakistan's government gave three million dollars to the Palestinian Authority when there are millions of Pakistanis sitting on the streets starving and living in worse conditions than many Palestinians.

This money could have gone to improve living conditions for Pakistanis at home (such as providing contraception) or even gone to Pakistani workers in Gulf countries who go unpaid for months and rely on bank loans to survive. Some even commit suicide to escape the unbearable slave-like conditions created by their greedy Arab employees.

Somewhere this inferiority complex towards Middle Eastern people has to stop if Pakistan is to progress as a country.