Monday, May 2, 2011

Brief thoughts on Osama Bin Laden's alleged "death," 911, and who he really was.

Because it's a global issue, I decided to discuss most of it on my World Issues and Politics blog, however since it also involves Pakistan based on the fact that he is claimed to have been there and Pakistan is now being blamed for "sheltering" him, many points should be touched upon in this post.

I cannot discuss every point as of yet since there isn't enough evidence of what exactly happened in Abbottabad, but a few strong points are already worthy of being mentioned.
A very important question in all of this is, if the CIA has been tapping on this residence alleged to have been Bin Laden's and monitoring all the activity there, how did they not know who was in contact with him?

They claim the house had no Internet or telephone connections and claimed they had been tapping on the activities of the house (ie burning garbage instead of laying it out for collection) as well as the people bringing in supplies to the house.

In all of this they fail to establish weather the residents of the house had contact with the ISI or other Pakistani military establishments.
Not to mention that they are refusing to share even pictures and videos of the alleged body of the wanted terrorist that they claimed to have disposed of in the Arabian Sea.

Another blame Pakistan game? Another excuse to cut off aid to Pakistan and slow down the economic decline by a few billion dollars?
It seems like this. Pakistani officials are good at deflecting military attacks on our country when they are really committed to do so, but not good enough at deflecting propaganda attacks against Pakistan even if they are committed to do so such as in this case.

Out of all the denials of any connections to Bin Laden assuming he was even there in the first place, none of the Pakistani government officials presented this challenging question to the world of how the CIA knew all along he was hiding in the house, his secretive activities which strangely does not include who he coordinated with.

They had a close tab on those entering/exiting the house, they established the house had no Internet or telephone connections yet they fail to establish weather the residents had outside contacts.
And if they did, what methods did they use? Internet and telephone have been ruled out, so what was the source of communication then?

The USA had been for a long time pushing for raids into Pakistan on the basis that Al-Queda was hiding there. The Indians and Afghans could not be anymore happier with such a claim. So perhaps that's what this entire staged drama was all about.

Now that they have most of the world believing them on finding and killing Bin Laden, further raids and drone attacks into Pakistan are what they are trying to justify. Not to mention their own ignorant and unintelligent public believing everything they see and hear on CNN, Fox News and other American propaganda broadcasts that are dubbed as news agencies.

Already they have been claiming that at least twenty Al-Queda suspects are on the loose in Pakistan. It also seems as a way of discrediting Pakistan and it's military efforts as they have been bent on.

And out of all this the only evidence I can see is the blood stains in the house that the alleged raid took place in.
And now the American government is refusing to share evidence of the entire killing. They claim the images are "too gruesome" to share in public, yet they claim they washed the body clean before sinking it onto the Arabian Sea. Not only that but they claimed to have filmed the entire process. What exactly is gruesome about showing an already washed body being sunk into the sea?

The 911 attacks were propagated to be the work of Al-Queda, but it took the American public years to finally suspect that the official story is untrue. Then when Bin Laden was allegedly killed, the same American public went wild with joy and put it's suspicions aside.

Perhaps the American government became too overconfident in the fact that it takes years for the American public to suspect something that they decided to experiment with the same propaganda methods as they did 911 (remember I am convinced like so many others that the attacks were staged by the Americans and perhaps a few of their allies were also involved).

Coincidentally as many have pointed out that Barack Obama's ratings were declining rapidly. Also coincidentally were recent criticisms coming out of the American media and political activists that the tenth anniversary of the 911 attacks is drawing closer and the US government and military had not even had a fully established trace on Bin Laden.

Then suddenly amid all of this, Bin Laden is located and killed. Completely out of proportion as far as I can see.
Not one piece of solid evidence provided for this and they are already pushing people into conclusion. My best guess is the "evidence" they fabricated of killing him has too many faults in it, so they are delaying their public and the world until they can develop more realistic "evidence."

They have probably learned from their mistakes when they staged the 911 attacks, so they are aiming not to make the same mistakes again before they go public with their "evidence."

I cannot comment further until there are more unfolds in this whole bizarre matter. Just that the American government and military's official inquiry about the Pakistani "connection" to the Al-Queda leader should be regarded as a time period to fabricate more "evidence" against Pakistan and it's irritant ISI which does not always share the agenda of America and NATO.

No comments:

Post a Comment